Showing posts with label Denominations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Denominations. Show all posts

A Personal History of Racism in Church

I wanted to make this a podcast, but when I started talking, I realized it was too much to fit in one episode (and as I started writing, I realized it was too much to fit into one post). With all that is going on, it was hard to order the memories and speak calmly—I've always found that writing about things that make me emotional is the only effective way of expressing myself. Upfront I'm asking for three things: 1) forgiveness for not recording this, 2) forgiveness for disrupting the podcast schedule and posting this as a series over the course of this week, and 3) that you will read the entire series.

I'm going to start this series by recounting a few personal memories involving race and Christianity.

Preschool

The first time I was made aware of race was actually at a church. My parents had placed me in a preschool that was run by the United Methodist Church as soon as my mother went back to work. So from the time I was about 6 months old until I went to kindergarten, I went to this preschool at the Methodist Church in my home town. Generally speaking, I have fond memories (which start at about the age of 3) from this preschool and of the kids I met there, but this is where I was first told I was black. Before I tell you how that unfolded, I need to point out a few things:
  • I was christened at an African Methodist Episcopal (AME) church—not a United Methodist Church and not the church that ran the preschool I attended
  • My mom's family is United Methodist, not AME
  • The AME Church was founded by blacks amidst racial discrimination at the hands of white Methodists. This tension culminated in an event in which white Methodists physically removed black Methodists who were on their knees praying. Established in 1787, the AME Church became the first independent denomination founded by African-Americans [1][2]
  • When I was born in 1988, 201 years later, there was still no integrated United Methodist Church in my hometown
  • There were significantly less children at the AME church, as well as less resources, therefore they did not have a preschool
  • During the four years I spent at this preschool, there was only one other black child there; she is a year younger than me and we are still friends
Now, for what happened. I was about four years old and one of the (white) girls from my class approached me and out of the blue said, "I'm white and you're black." I thought she was referencing literal colors. So I did what any good friend would: I took her to the Crayola box, pulled out a black crayon, a white crayon, a peach crayon, and a tumbleweed crayon, and then showed her which colors did and did not match our skin tones. I was deeply concerned, because you have to know your colors to enter kindergarten and clearly she did not know her colors. I don't know if my teacher watched this interaction and then told my parents, or if I told them myself (the little girl was my dad's coworker's daughter), but somehow these events were relayed to my parents who began "the talk" in which they explained to me that I am what society calls "a black person."

To this day, I don't know why she felt the need to inform me that I was black. It seems that it meant something to her and I can only imagine that's because of the context in which she picked up the concept.

The After School Program

Once I started elementary school (at the public school), some friends of the family convinced my parents that the answer to after school care was an after school program at the Catholic Church. They each had a daughter who attended the program and I knew those 2 girls well because they took piano lessons from my grandmother. Since our families were close (to the point of us claiming to be related most of my childhood), my parents enrolled me as well. We were the only black people in the program.

Since the 2 girls I knew were 2 years older than me, we were supposed to be in separate classes. I'm not sure what prompted the beginning of this practice, but every day, they would casually sneak me out of the line going to my class and into the line going to their class. The teachers had to know—if not there are bigger questions that need to be raised—but they never sent me back to my age group. I made friends with a few of the white girls from their class and the guys let me play video games with them (but only if I played as Peach 😒).

One day, neither of them were there. I was 6, and I was scared to sneak myself out of line to go to the big kid class. Besides, what if the big kids were only nice to me because there were two other big kids "protecting" me? So I stayed in my line, and for the first time, I went to my class with the other 6 year olds. We were sitting at a very long table and one of the girls in the class was making her way around the table. When she got to me, she stopped, looked me in my face and called me a n*****. I'm not proud of what happened next, but I'm going to tell you because it's what happened.

By that age, I understood what the word meant (my first time hearing it had been 2 years prior, fortunately not at a Church), so I punched a girl who was mentally disabled. I didn't know what mentally disabled was, and truth be told, she probably didn't fully understand what the n-word was. The adult in the room saw the whole thing and recounted the story to the director. There was no "he said, she said" about it. The girl didn't deny calling me the n-word; I didn't deny punching her. When our parents showed up, my dad and her dad almost got into a fight. Her dad was, understandably, concerned that his daughter had been punched. My dad was, understandably, concerned as to why a 6 year old mentally disabled girl not only knew the n-word but also knew enough to know who to direct it toward. Her dad called for me to be kicked out of the program. My dad argued that if they kicked me out, they should also discipline the girl who called me the n-word. As is so common with people today the director didn't want to "offend" anyone. She didn't want my parents to get mad that she wasn't disciplining and condemning racism, but she didn't want to upset the white man who's disabled daughter had been punched.

So it came down to the moment when adults expect you to be remorseful and apologize. Since she was mentally disabled, they didn't expect her to understand what she had done was wrong, but they expected me to acknowledge my wrong in punching her and apologize. "Shiree, what do you have to say about this?" Clear as day, I can hear myself say, "I bet she won't call anybody else a n*****." I had no remorse. I didn't feel bad about punching her until I met a (white) boy with cerebral palsy and saw kids picking on him. It took me understanding what it actually meant to be disabled to realize that I hadn't understood that she was mentally disabled in that moment, and just like I didn't understand her condition, she was just saying something she'd been taught.

I can't honestly say I would have done something differently if I had known she was disabled, because 6 year old me was impulsive and hot tempered, but I can say that in hindsight, I think the director should have disciplined both of us. Instead, she chose not to offend anyone and agreed that I would always go to the older class so we would never cross paths again. She failed, and my parents withdrew me from the program by the end of the week (as soon as they set up an alternate).

VBS at the White Baptist Church

Once I started elementary school, I favored my dad's Baptist church—it was across the street so I could go even if my parents didn't, and my cousins who were around the same age as me also attended. The Baptist church I attended was all black. The white Baptist church is less than a mile up the road from the church I grew up attending. I rode the bus with the kids who went to the white Baptist church (some of whom called my cousins and I the n-word on the bus). One of my best friends from elementary school, and one of two people to hold a sleepover that my parents actually allowed me to go to, went to that church. Her parents and my parents were volunteer fire-fighters together. My AP English teacher went to that church—she graduated high school with my mom and taught my older cousins when they were in school. The people who attend that church have lived in that community for well over 100 years. I know, because my family has been living there in the same community for the same 100 years—the Church has even been declared a historical landmark and has a plaque commemorating its age.

It's very possible that some of their ancestors owned mine.

Because I had friends that went to the white Church, they always invited me to Vacation Bible School, and my parents would take me. Their VBS never overlapped ours so I went multiple times—but I've never been to a service there and they never accepted an invitation to come to our VBS. Black Baptists and white Baptists don't go church together.

Baptist Funerals

As I said, the families in my community have been there for generations. Everybody knows everybody and everybody's parents grew up together. So, when someone died everyone knew them. Everyone comes to pay respect. Everyone goes to "the other" church to attend the funeral. But on Sunday morning, black Baptists and white Baptists don't go church together.

Voting at a Baptist Church

The polling place for my precinct is the white Baptist church less than a mile from the black Baptist church I grew up in (it's much larger so that makes sense). The people who man the polls are people who go to that church, because the people who go to that church are also the community. There were exactly 4 Democrats at that polling place when I was a child—my mom, my dad, my grandmother, and my aunt. Sometimes I went with them to vote, and often there was a problem. Usually it was because they didn't want my 80+ year old grandmother (who had cataract surgery and grew up in the era when neither women nor black people were afforded much education) to have assistance reading the ballot. When I turned 18, I became the 5th Democrat on their roster. I voted there twice, and both times I had a problem. The first time there was "an error" and my name wasn't on the roster. Despite me showing them both a valid voter's registration and ID, I had to go to the county voting office and get an official letter from the county confirming I was eligible to vote. The second time, I had filled out an application to vote absentee because I thought I would be 4 hours away in school. When I discovered that I would be home, I canceled the absentee ballot, went to the county office to confirm, got the official letter/documents, presented them at the polling place and was met with opposition. This time a phone call had to be placed (since I already had the documents verifying that I never received an absentee ballot).

White Visitors at the Black Baptist Church

Once, a white couple who was new in town accidentally came to our church instead of the white church. There was an audible gasp from them and stunned looks from us when they entered. They did not stay and they did not come back, because black Baptists and white Baptists don't go church together.

College

I gave a little history regarding the split between the Methodist and AME church to point out the irony of my preschool, now I want to dive into the history of the Baptist church. The only thing I learned from Baptists themselves about sub-denominations within the faith is that Missionary Baptist Churches are most likely black,[3] and Southern Baptist Churches are most likely white. Unlike the Methodist Church, Baptists don't have the same hierarchal structure. There isn't a council that votes to make all Baptist churches integrated and then fires pastors who disobey. At least, Missionary Baptists don't. When I left for college at 18, I had never seen an integrated Baptist Church. The closest thing I've seen is a token person who is there because of interracial marriage/dating.

Despite having predominately attended a Baptist church from the time I was 5 onward, when I went to college at 18, I proclaimed myself a Methodist and looked for a Methodist church to attend. It had nothing to do with doctrine. I was afraid of walking into the wrong Baptist church. From a technical standpoint, the Methodist Church was already integrated when I was born. By the time I was a pre-teen, that trend spread into my hometown. At one point there was a Methodist Church with an all white congregation and a black pastor. When I left for college, Methodist churches seemed safer. That sentence that I just wrote, that should not be a sentence. At no point should a church that is following God feel unsafe.

Did you know that when given the chance to speak out against white supremacy, the Southern Baptist church did so with controversy?[4] It was not an unequivocal, unified, one accord, condemnation of racism. Despite the New Testament giving clear examples of a multiracial Church—in the first round of converting non-Jews, there was an Ethiopian and Roman (Acts 8; 10). Of course, that makes sense when you consider that the Southern Baptist Church split from the Baptist Church because Baptists in the North fought to free the slaves. They didn't acknowledge this or change their stance until 1995. It took another 20 years for them to call for reconciliation.[4] For reference, I graduated from college in 2010.

Thoughts

This is not what this Christianity is supposed to look like. You cannot claim to love God and hate your fellow humans. Most people know that, but you also can't claim to love God and idly watch some one else mistreat your neighbor. Do you think Christ would have watched someone disrespect and abuse another person in His presence? Did He not stop them from stoning a woman caught in idolatry (which was lawfully punishable by death at the time)? Did He not offer entry into the kingdom to a Samaritan? Did His disciples not convert an Ethiopian? How can the true body of Christ be silent when injustice is all around them? In the rest of the series I want to talk more about the "church"'s connection to racism in America historically, and what the Bible says about the nature/response of a true Church.
“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! You pay a tenth of mint, dill, and cumin, and yet you have neglected the more important matters of the law—justice, mercy, and faithfulness. These things should have been done without neglecting the others.Matthew 23:23 CSB

References

  1. Dennis C. Dickerson. "Our History". The Official Website African Methodist Episcopal Church; visited June 1, 2020
  2. "Richard Allen ". PBS; visited June 1, 2020
  3. "What is a Missionary Baptist Church?". GotQuestions.org; visited June 1, 2020
  4. Judith Valente. "Southern Baptist Pastor Confronts His Own, Church's Racial Past". NPR from Illinois State University. June 22, 2017

Stolen Ideas

My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.
Because you have rejected knowledge,
I will reject you from serving as my priest.
Since you have forgotten the law of your God,
I will also forget your sons.
Hosea 4:6 CSB

I wrote a post on denominations and major doctrines that divide them a while back.[1] You can read it here.

Forgive me for sounding out of it. It was a rough week at work so I had a lot on my mind as I was recording and kept getting distracted.

Did you know that halos are part of sun worship and have nothing to do with the Word of God?

References

  1. Ree Hughes. "What's Your Denomination?". PSALMS to God. April 11, 2015

Who Do You Pray To?

Let me be honest upfront, we don't all worship the same God. We may all say God/YHWH/Elohim or Jesus/Yeshua/Christ, but if we start talking about the character of the God we serve, you'll see that we aren't talking about the same deity. God only has one Church (we're going to get deeper into that next season on the podcast), and that Church should follow His values. When we have values that are vastly different than those outlined in the Bible, it says that we're serving the god of our mind's creation as opposed to the God who created us.

Hollywood and Disney movies (particularly the old ones) have us under the impression that the devil will be an overtly evil villain. For instance, in the original Sleeping Beauty, you have a horned Maleficent casting a death curse on a baby and saying she's "calling on the powers of evil" (or darkness—I can't remember the exact word). Recently, however, movies have started to show more complex villains; villains you sympathize with. Villains that make you question your definition of good and evil. That's the field the devil is playing on. He doesn't have to get you to become an atheist or a satanist to claim a victory; all he has to do is deceive you.

Last week, I had an eye-opening conversation with a pastor I met. While boasting about his church's support of ecumenism, he revealed that there are people in his congregation that don't believe in the power of Christ's blood and therefore, he doesn't pray in the name of the Messiah. If he had told me he didn't believe in the blood of Christ and that was why he didn't pray in such a manner, it would have been fine—I wouldn't have agreed, but it would make sense. The concept presented, however, is that he prays in a way to not offend or to appease those around him. Therein lies the problem.

For his specific example, there are two issues. One, he isn't teaching the people what God has revealed to him. Imagine if Daniel had said he wouldn't interpret the dream because the king didn't worship the Most High God. Imagine if the disciples refused to spread Christ's message because it went against what the Jewish leaders were teaching. We are called to preach the whole gospel, not pieces of the gospel. Therefore, we have a responsibility to those around us to teach all the Lord tells us to.

The second issue is that he's going against his own belief to accommodate man. If you believe that "no one comes to the Father without going through [Jesus]," then you know that you can never approach God without Christ covering and cleansing your sins with His blood (through His sacrifice). Given this, a prayer that isn't passed through Christ is worthless.

There is also a set of broader issues we should discuss. If I'm in a diverse room and they ask me to pray, or even if it's just one individual who has differing beliefs. If I never specify which God I am speaking of, everyone gets confused. If you are Hindu and worship Hindu gods, you may believe I'm praying to them. If you worship creation, you may think I'm praying to it. Yet, 1 Thessalonians 5:22 says that we are to abstain from the appearance of evil. That means you should never think I'm praying to anyone other than the God of Abraham. Furthermore, if I am praying for your healing (or in this case, justice), when it comes to fruition, it is YHWH that should get the credit. However, if I did a generic prayer, even if YHWH received it without complaint, the person listening wouldn't attribute subsequent miracles with the God of Abraham.

Needless to say, I spent a lot of time after this conversation contemplating the issue. I must say, after thinking on the matter, I don't feel comfortable in settings where people are praying, but I am unsure who they are praying to.
Photocredit: Unsplash.com/Ben White

Born Again

How is it that I’ve been a follower of Christ for 18+ years, but I’m not baptized? Let’s talk about baptism; let’s talk about what it means, what it should mean, and why I take it so seriously. Also, as of recording this, my baptism date might be sooner than you think.

Season 1 Episode 13


And now, why are you delaying? Get up and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on his name.’Acts 22:16 CSB
00:01:03 Hey guys, welcome back to PSALMS to God podcast! Today's episode is on why I’m not baptized or rather it’s on what I think of baptism—I don’t know, y’all, we're talking about baptism. We're talking about being born again and all of the things that go along with it.
00:01:23 So I started believing in God at a very, very young age; and when I think about the fact that I grew up predominantly in a Baptist Church, it is very surprising that I'm not baptized, because Baptists put a huge emphasis on baptism. The main problem I had growing up with baptism was that I didn't understand it. I knew that Jesus was baptized and I knew that it was something that people did but outside of a tradition, I didn't understand how it fit into things. The main teaching that was prevalent, I guess in my family and the church that I grew up in, was that baptism represented the death and resurrection of Jesus. Now that's not wrong; it's true. It does represent the death and resurrection of Jesus, but as a child what I couldn't get over was the fact that people was getting baptized well before Jesus died. And a lot of these people didn't think Jesus was going to die. The disciples were confused. They did not actually think Jesus was going to die. They thought He was going to establish His kingdom right there in Israel, right then in their lifetime, that He was going to expel the Romans and they were going to live happily ever after. They were not following Him thinking, “oh, we’re going to follow You for a couple of years, and then You're going to get handed over to the Romans and they're going to crucify You.” Like, that's not what they thought was going to happen. So my question was always, like, something else has to be tied to this whole concept of baptism, because all of this was going on—in fact, John the Baptist was baptizing people before Jesus even started His ministry. So what I really wanted to understand as a child was how all of these things tied in.
00:03:31 There is super simple answers to these questions—like, number one: Messianic prophecy. All of these people were awaiting the Messiah; they may not have known it was Jesus, specifically, but they knew that the Messiah was supposed to come. And then, of course, all of this ties into the feasts and the sacrificial system that God laid out from The Exodus onward. These are things that Paul refers to as “the shadow of things to come.”[1] They all pointed to Jesus, and Jesus fulfilled the requirements. This is why Jesus was crucified at Passover: He was the Passover Lamb, and that's why it's important that Passover and the resurrection—well Passover and the crucifixion—happen simultaneously, and then, you know, the resurrection happening a few days later. This is how everything plays out—it's all symbolic. It's all fulfillment a prophecy that’s all playing in to the Baptism. And that would have been a very simple answer for the people at the church to give to me, but they couldn't.
00:04:42 And when they couldn't answer my question, I didn't think they knew what they were talking about. So I wouldn't let them baptize me, because I felt like you should know what you're talking about and what you're doing if you're going to baptize me, and I should fully understand what it is that I'm committing to and what I am staying with this action. I've always been someone who wants to know what it is that I'm saying and what it means. I think think it’s a very deliberate action, and I saw it as something that was very serious, and not something to do just because everyone's doing it, not to do it just because that's what is expected, or that's with traditional, and that is what prevented me from getting baptized at the moment that I decided that Jesus was Who He said He was.
00:05:36
Photocredit: Unsplash.com/Jong Marshes
Fast forward into present-day and you know, I did my studying I started to understand more about what Baptism is and how it plays out—and you know, actually, before I continue the story, before I start to get into where I am in the baptism journey, I actually want to stop and talk some more about what baptism is, because we live in a society and a time where we are blessed beyond our wildest imagination. Yeah there's a lot of stuff going on; it's crazy. Things could definitely be better. That’s, you know, the problem with living in a fallen world, there's always something to complain about, but in previous times... So, like, if we go back to the days of Moses, and we go back to the days of Jesus, there were a lot of people who could not read. Bible were not just out for people to consume, or I guess at that time, the Old Testament was not just out for people to consume. It was written on scrolls kept by the scribes and the priests, and you had to go to them to get knowledge and to get the Word of God, unless God blessed you and came and talked to you directly. Moving into, you know, the Dark Ages, there were Bibles and there was texts, but they were only translated into Latin. So if you didn't speak Latin, you couldn't read it. Once again, there were only certain people who were actually afforded the privilege of an education to know how to read. Then of course you know they started translating Bibles into the common vernacular, and so people could read it if they could speak that language, but once again you still had to be able to read, you still had to have access to the book, and that struggle has been going on. You know, it went on for a long time. I mean obviously I am a descendant of slaves. My ancestors were not allowed to read, therefore, they would not have been able to read a Bible, even though it would have been available in English, They couldn't have bought a Bible either. All kinds of problems that would have existed with that…
00:07:54 But in today's society, not only do most people have the ability to read, we have audio books so it can be read to you. We have Google and we have Ctrl+F—! Y'all, you could find anything with Ctrl+F—or Cmd+F, for my fellow Mac users out there. But you can go on Google and you can type in, you know, “verses about baptism,” and just find list of verses about baptism. You don't have to memorize the whole Bible, or you know, search through it on your own to find it, which is a blessing. We can get to information so much quicker that way, and we should definitely be taking advantage of that.
00:08:41 And so with that being said I get deeper into the story about baptism and where I am on my journey, there are actually two verses that I want to read about it. One is expanding on what baptism is and what it symbolizes, and the other one is going to set the tone for what I'm going to talk about in terms of why I've struggled with getting baptized, since I've understood what it means.[2]
00:09:12 The first verse I want to read is in 1 Peter 3:18-22: “For Christ also suffered for sins once for all, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring you to God. He was put to death in the flesh but made alive by the Spirit, in which he also went and made proclamation to the spirits in prison who in the past were disobedient, when God patiently waited in the days of Noah while the ark was being prepared. In it a few—that is, eight people—were saved through water. Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you (not as the removal of dirt from the body, but the pledge of a good conscience toward God) through the resurrection of Jesus Christ, who has gone into heaven and is at the right hand of God with angels, authorities, and powers subject to him.”
00:10:16 Now a second verse I want to read is in Matthew 28:17-20: “When they saw him, they worshiped, but some doubted. Jesus came near and said to them, “All authority has been given to me in heaven and on earth. Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations,baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe everything I have commanded you. And remember, I am with you always, to the end of the age.””[3]
00:10:59 So, the reason I wanted to point out these two verses is because they highlight some things that I think are very important in baptism. The first is that baptism is a pledge. It is a pledge of your allegiance to God. It is a declaration that you believe in the Most High, that you accept the gift of salvation that Jesus has given us through His crucifixion and resurrection, and it is a...I guess a sign of surrender to Him—that you are submitting to his kingdom and making Him King over your life. The second verse speaks on the fact that you are baptized in that authority, that you are baptized in the name of the Father. the Son, and the Holy Spirit, and that you are following the teachings of Jesus and of Christ.[4] So basically you're following what's written in the word of God, the Bible.
00:12:06 The problem that I've had since I understand what baptism is and have been trying to get baptized is that I don't want to be baptized into a denomination. I don't believe in denominations. Denominations are man-made organizations and are operating off of man-made traditions. Yes, I understand why there are denominations. I understand why the church is fractured, and it has a lot to do with Satan playing with words and confusing interpretations, so we believe things that are different doctrinally. That is why you choose to go to different churches. And I fully understand that, and I'm not saying that that's not valid, but the fact of the matter is, when you profess to believe in God, you're you're pledging—like, I said it's a pledge of allegiance, and I don't want to pledge my allegiance to the Baptist Church or the Methodist Church or the Seventh Day Adventist Church or the Presbyterian Church. I want to pledge my allegiance to Christ. There is only one body of Christ! People say ”the church” a lot of times they mean the church with the little C, but I'm talking about “the Church” with a Capital C, and that is the body of Christ that's following the word of God. They're keeping the law and the testimony of Jesus Christ [5] and that has nothing to do with any man made entity, and I'm not trying to be out here calling myself by these names of these denominations.
00:13:54 It's interesting. I’ve met that people that are like “Yo, I'm a Lutheran.” So you followed the teachings of Martin Luther? I’mma need you to not follow the teachings of Martin Luther, I’mma need you to follow the teachings of Jesus Christ. Martin Luther may have been trying to follow Jesus Christ, but at the end of the day Martin Luther is just a man, and he could have messed up. He could have gotten an interpretation wrong, or He could have got some right. At the end of the day your standard still needs to be Jesus, not Luther. I've seen this a lot. I attend a Seventh-Day Adventist Church, and a lot of times people get up and are like, “I'm an Adventist. Adventists do this. We’re Adventists. This is how Adventists behave.” And I’m like, “No, you're an Adventist. I am a follower of Christ.” I don't follow Adventism, because Adventism is a man-made institution, and it can be right in some cases, and it can be wrong in some cases. I agree with a majority of what I've know that they teach—I don't know what all they teach, to be honest, because like I said, I’m not an Adventist. The things that I do know, most of them I agree with, that's why I attend your church, but if at any point I think that your beliefs differ from what is taught by the Bible, then I'm going with the Bible. I'm not going with you because I'm a follower of Christ not of Adventism.
00:15:19 You know, it's interesting because to me it's so obvious because you just look at what you're calling yourself, and it's not pointing back to Christ. When I first walked in, and people kept talking about adventism, I'm not going to lie I didn't know what Advent meant. And I grew up in a church! So if I didn't know what advent meant, and I grew up in the church, I grew up a believer, I grew up studying the Word of God... I took a theology classes in college, and I still didn't know what this word meant, you cannot tell me if you go up to the average person on the side of the street who doesn't know anything about God, that they're going to connect the word Advent to Jesus Christ. I'm just not, I'm not buying that, I'm sorry.
00:16:11 And so, the problem I’ve had, is that normally when you go to somebody, they are not really interested in the concept of baptizing you just in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit; they're trying to make you a member of their church with a little C, but I'm not trying to be a member of your church with a little C. I’m trying to be a member of the Church with a Capital C. I'm not... I'm not interested in extracurricular activities, OK? This ain’t about building resumes. This is not about all this other stuff. I'm not trying to have citizenship in all these other kingdom and all this stuff; I'm only trying to be in The Kingdom, OK? There's only one Kingdom, and that’s the kingdom I'm trying to get citizenship in.
00:16:55 I've had... I've noticed that... I mean, if you go to these different churches, even how you go about getting baptized is different, and it boggles my mind. So growing up in a Baptist church: at every service they have an altar call. They ask you if you want to be baptized If you go down and say “yes, I want to be baptized. I've been called to be baptized.” You talk to the preacher, they give you a date, you to show up, they dunk you in the water, you've been baptized. You are now a member of the Baptist Church.
00:17:25 Now, that being said, there's a lot lacking, because there is no spiritual mentorship, or guidance and discipleship, or anything. It's kind of just random. Like you just walk up and say “I want to be baptized,” then it's done, which is what happened to a lot of my family members who grew up in a Baptist Church. And so it doesn't necessarily promote spiritual growth. So when I talked to the preacher at the church I attend and now, I fully understood his point of view that you know, baptism; it's about rebirth it's about being born again. And so you know, as he was saying, like an ideal situation is not a baby coming into the world with no family, right? You want them to have a family. That's what the church is for; that's why you're supposed to be baptized into a body of believers, and then you're supposed to be nurtured by those believers. It’s not the intent that you get baptized and then just go off on your own.
00:18:32 Of course that's not what I'm asking, either. It's not that I don't want to be affiliated with other Christians, it's being affiliated with a man-made religion. But even then, the way they do baptism is that when you express an interest in being baptized, they have a baptismal class and you have to attend this class. And in this class, they go over these fundamental beliefs of their denomination, which then, when you agree to be baptized you're basically affirming that you agree with those fundamental beliefs, and at that point, I feel like you're not being baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, you're being baptized in the name of the Father, Son, Holy Spirit, and all of these fundamental beliefs that belong to this man-made entity. You're pledging your allegiance to this doctrine.
00:19:28 And to be honest, I don't agree with all of the fundamental beliefs that they put before me. I didn't attend the class, either. I read the verses, and I read the pamphlet, and I read the booklet. And you know, there are parts of it that I'm like, “Yeah, I totally fully agree with that.” I didn't need to read the book to understand that or to believe that, but then there were parts that I was like, “Yeah, nope. I don't agree with that.” And then there were parts that I was like, “I don't know.” If you know anything about Seventh-day Adventists, you know that they think that Ellen White was a prophet, I've never read any of her writings. I don't know. I’ve heard some interesting things about her; there are some people who would definitely contest the fact that she's a prophet. I can't tell you one way or the other, but I'm really trying to study the Word of God. I'm trying to be solid on what The Word says, so I don't really have time to go off and be reading her writings, because at this point, I just want to be more solid, like I said, in The Word. And anything that brought up outside of that has to be measured against The Word, and if I'm not solid in The Word, I can't tell you if she's a prophet or not, because I got to be solid with the Bible first. So I don't really have time to read about her to determine whether I agree or disagree. So I'm not about to commit to that to be baptized, obviously, and I don't think I should have to.
00:21:09 Even here, when they're baptizing people in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, they're not asking to affirm that Moses was who Moses was, that Moses was a prophet or that he was a prolific person in the grand scheme of things. They're asking “Do you believe that Jesus is the son of God, that he died on the cross to save you from your sins?” Now that being said, in order for these people to have affirm that, you have to come to the agreement that you know, what Moses wrote was from God, and that the prophecies that Isaiah outlined, and that these other people outlined were true, because they point to the Messiah. So all of that goes hand-in-hand, however, all of that is contained within the Bible, so in order to get baptized you really don't need to affirm anyone that comes after the Bible. In fact you shouldn't be affirming anyone that comes after the Bible, because what you should be affirming is that the Bible is the core of your belief, and anything that contradicts it is not of God. If you’re going with what's here. then sure maybe you are a prophet. You know, but that's not contingent upon me being baptized, if that makes any sense.
00:22:33 And so really the way I felt about it is that this is not the biblical way of baptism. I just want somebody to dunk me in the water and say “I baptize you in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit,” and I want it to be a profession of my allegiance to Christ and to God, the kingdom of God, and that I am committing to studying the Word of God, and allowing the Holy Spirit to teach me what I'm supposed to know. And that I'm committing to following whatever the Holy Spirit leads me to. So like I said, “the Church.” I don't really care about all of this man made extraness, and all of this stuff that's tradition and whatever the case may be. So that's really been the holdup of why I have not been baptized since I've come to the understanding of what it means to be baptized, and since I've accepted that explanation. But I do feel like I've been baptized of the Holy Spirit, because I have already committed to God and I have already surrendered to God.
00:23:57 It’s not like I'm over here thinking like, “Well, I don’t know what I believe or if I believer.” Like that's not the case. And I do believe in baptism, and I do believe that we should be baptized, that we should be following the example that Christ set forth for us. For me it's just a matter of when and where, and finding somebody that understands what I'm saying when I say I want to be baptized into thee Church, and not some random church or a church. And that's basically where I am.
00:24:32 So for my prayer warriors out there that listen in, please pray for me and for the people surrounding me, you know, that the Holy Spirit will make a way, and that me and the pastor that I’ve been talking to come to some sort of agreement, and that you know I can finally take that step. Because I do think that once the Holy Spirit convicts you of something then you are obligated to carry it out in the manner that the Holy Spirit asks of you. And I feel like the conviction that the Holy Spirit has put on my heart is there for a reason. If it didn't matter then you know, I probably would have been baptized a year ago. It would have happened and I wouldn't have thought twice about it, but there is a conviction there, that it should be done the right way, and that conviction has been there for a while, and so I want to carry it out the way the Spirit has it planned to be carried out. And you know, for a while I felt some type of way about it. I felt like “Oh, maybe something's wrong with me. Maybe I'm confused. Maybe the devil is at work here,” but when I actually looked back at my own story, and I looked at Jesus' story. I realized that I think—no I know, that it's going exactly the way God planned it to. It parallels! I mean Jesus went to the Temple to learn when he was 12; I was about 12 when I came into the understanding of what I believed. But Jesus didn’t get baptized until he was 30; and I'm 30. So, we'll see. I'm just going to follow where the Holy Spirit leads, so stay tuned in. Like I said keep praying for me!
00:26:48 Thank you guys for tuning in. I hope this episode was a blessing. If you are also thinking about being baptized or you're not sure what you believe, I definitely encourage you to reach out to other believers, to read the word for yourself— like I said we live in a blessed generation where knowledge is at the tip of our fingertips, so I definitely encourage you to make the time to spend with God in the Word to try to get closer and to try to understand what it is you believe in. I will be praying for you, and you should pray for yourself that God would show you what direction he has for you, and I hope that you will also pursue citizenship in the Kingdom of Heaven. So not only will I see you in the afterlife, but I will hopefully see you in the next episode. Thank you guys once again for tuning in. Don't forget to subscribe, like, follow on Instagram, whatever makes you happiest. You can find a transcript of this specific episode at www.psalmstogod.com/bornagain. See you next time.

Footnotes and References

  1. Hebrews 8:5; 10:1
  2. Clearly I was having trouble spiting my words out here.
  3. You’re right, I didn’t need as much as I read for context, but that’s what I saw first as I was recording, so I just went with it
  4. I don’t know why I worded this like this
  5. Revelation 12:17

Is Wearing Jewelry a Sin?

A common view point of some churches is that we are not supposed to wear jewelry. Some members are extremely conservative, casting off all jewelry; some members are extremely liberal, wearing any jewelry they choose; and other are moderate, deeming certain jewelry functional and therefore acceptable (i.e., wedding rings, watches, etc.). I ended up discussing this with a pastor who believes we should not wear jewelry. Since I already have posts that touch on this question, I wanted to share my thoughts from that conversation.

The Condemnation of Jewelry

Photocredit: Unsplash.com/Artem Bali
The verses most commonly cited to condemn the wearing of jewelry are 1 Timothy 2:9-10 and 1 Peter 3:3. We could spend days talking about these verses, but I'll try to keep it brief.

1 Timothy 2:9-10

For context, this letter in 1 Timothy is written by Paul to Timothy, who is at the church of Ephesus. Ephesus was located in western Turkey, near the modern city of Selƈuk. The city of Ephesus was home to the Temple of Artemis/Diana,[3] the Greek/Roman goddess of wild animals and hunting. They were also associated with chastity and childbirth.[1][2] In both Greek and Roman mythology, these goddesses were looked to by women for issues surrounding fertility. This background is important in knowing the culture of the people there, whom Timothy was converting to Christianity. Their previous religious practices would have been heavily geared toward worshipping this pagan goddess. Many of the issues in the New Testament letters speak to specific issues converts had in adjusting to their new life in Christ, and while similar issues arise with us today, it's also important to keep in mind the original problem so as not to distort the Word.

In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array; But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works. 1 Timothy 2:9-10 KJV
Now, let's get into what Paul is telling Timothy. Paul's instructions to the women at Ephesus follow his message to men—"in like manner," tells us that whatever he instructs parallels what he instructed for men just before these verses. In 1 Timothy 2:8, Paul says men are to pray everywhere and lift up holy hands; both of these things are to be done without anger or doubt. So the heart of this matter is about worshipping and praising God. Essentially, everywhere men of God go, they should be in connection (praying) with God and worshipping Him. So the like manner for women refers to how we should be in connection with and worship God, as well. This is when Paul gets into the adornment of women... Paul says we are to "adorn [our]selves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array."

We'll talk about all the points in the verse when we get to 1 Timothy in the Bible Study section, but for now, we're going to focus on gold and pearls. Because we're talking a out modest apparel, the assumption is that gold and pearls refers to jewelry, though one might be able to argue this applies to broaches and embroidery on garments (yes, I've seen gold and pearls embedded in shoes, purses, etc.). The pastor highlighted that when looking at the structure of the sentence, it's clear that Paul is saying these things are not included in modest apparel.

1 Peter 3:3

The letter in 1 Peter echoes Paul's sentiment that beauty should come from within, not from fancy hair or gold jewelry. The context of 1 Peter is that Peter wrote to the believers who were living as exiles in various cities. These people were those who stood for Christ and were now banished from society for their courage and faith.

Is It Really a Condemnation, Though?

When it comes to earrings, Paul's got me. If you've read my previous posts on jewelry, you know that I have an allergy to "fake" jewelry (so probably to nickel) that presents itself only when I wear earrings. So, while all of my earrings have fake pearls and cubic zirconia instead of diamonds, the post that goes into the ear are always either real gold or sterling silver—but Paul didn't say anything about silver, or nickel, or steel. Come to think of it he didn't mention diamonds, rubies, emeralds, sapphires, or any other precious stones.

I've heard many sermons that caution against "walking the line." What they're referring to is trying to figure out where the boundary is and getting as close to the edge as you can without crossing that line. They often summarize this point to the fact that we should not want anything to do with something that displeases God. So many of them would ignore the fact that Paul doesn't mention all of these other common metals and gems used for jewelry and the fact that today most of us wear inexpensive fake jewelry, not real gold or pearls. They would hold fast to God doesn't like jewelry, so it doesn't matter if it's real gold or fake gold.

Verses I Brought Up in the Discussion

That stance would be perfectly acceptable to me, except, going into the meeting, I felt like there were many verses that suggested God was OK with jewelry. Many of the verses I had prepared when I went to talk to the pastor were written off as neither endorsing nor condemning (Genesis 24:22,30,53 and Exodus 3:22) or not about wearing jewelry (Exodus 25-26).

Abraham

I brought up the fact that Abraham gave his servant jewelry to give the woman who would become Isaac's wife, Rebekah (Genesis 24). The pastor countered that just because it wasn't condemned, it doesn't mean it was OK. He went on to reason that Abraham was sent out, away from his family to be righteous—suggesting that this was a holdover from lingering traditions or an attempt to avoid offense. However, the pastor also reasoned that the reason Abraham had to send his servant back to his family to find a wife for Isaac is because the Canaanites he was living amongst were pagan.

That seems like circular reasoning to me. If both Abraham's family and the Canaanites were doing things God didn't like, what difference did it make? If Abraham's family is simply the lesser of two evils, then why God did send him away from his family into more—or worse—unrighteousness?

Judah and Joseph

I didn't bring up Genesis 38:18 or Genesis 41:42, but it falls in a similar vein as Genesis 24. Both see two sons of Jacob (re: two patriarchs of the 12 Tribes of Israel), Judah and Joseph, wearing some type of ring. In these cases I could see a better arguement for them not being a standard to measure ourselves after. Judah is giving up his ring after soliciting sex from a woman he perceives to be a prostitute (it's actually his daughter-in-law), which says a lot about him. Joseph receives his ring in Egypt from pharaoh, both of whom are known enemies of God.

Building the Tabernacle

I mentioned building the tabernacle because it's the jewelry the Israelites take from the Egyptians in Exodus 3:22 that they use to melt into gold and silver for the tabernacle. Those who condemn jewelry are quick to point out that the Israelites used jewelry to create the golden calf, but never get to the part where they create the tabernacle with jewelry, too (Exodus 35:22). The jewelry comes from the same place. If God despised the jewelry, why would he allow it to be used for the tabernacle? For building the ark of the covenant (Exodus 36-37)?

The pastor is convinced that it is that God doesn't have a problem with jewels and jewelry, but with the wearing of jewelry. It seemed plausible, but the more I dig, the more I question that. I'll talk about that in the next section about the verses I found later.

More Questions

Photocredit: Unsplash.com/Charisse Kenion
Solely off of the discussion with the pastor, I basically had the question: why didn't God condemn rings if they were such a big deal? If we look back at Joseph, comparing him to say Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah. They stood for God in a foreign land and were still raised to high places. Their story clearly shows the importance of resisting the urge to pollute our bodies with unclean foods (Daniel 1) or worship (even appear to worship) idols (Daniel 3). Nothing about Joseph's story suggests we should refuse jewelry given to us as gifts. When God commands the Israelites to take the jewelry from Egypt, He doesn't give any instruction about not wearing it.

Now, clearly there are times when a law isn't explicitly told to us at the time of event. "Thou shalt not kill" comes significantly later in chronological time than when Cain kills Abel. However, God makes it very clear that killing is wrong right in that example and we can assume this law was known by everyone if not solely by the example made of Cain. God took a stance and said "this is not ok, do not do this." The only place jewelry seems to be condemned is out of the mouth of Paul and Peter, neither of whom can make a law...

Verses That Support The Condemnation of Jewelry

Genesis 35

In Genesis 35:4, Jacob buries earrings that belong to his family before approaching God. This is of course, one of the passages many pastors bring up to say jewelry is bad. However, I noticed a few interesting things about this that make me question that interpretation.

First, the command is given to purify themselves because they have been worshipping foreign gods. When the earrings are surrendered, they are surrendered with the foreign gods. I was not alive during Jacob's time, and I do not know what these earrings looked like, but today there are earrings bearing the resemblance of the eye of horus, an ankh, occult symbolism, animals, words, etc. Is it possible that these earrings were part of the idol worship not because they were earrings but because of their symbolism?

Second, I ask this question because it doesn't say they handed over bracelets or necklaces. Did they not have any of these items? We know that Jacob's mother (Rebekah) was given bracelets by Abraham's servant, so it wasn't a foreign concept to them. I don't know any women today who have earrings but don't have bracelets or necklaces, as well. I speak as someone who doesn't wear jewelry often, yet in my possession are necklaces, earrings, bracelets/watches, and rings; I may have more necklaces than rings or bracelets, but I have at least one. So if I was called to cast out my earrings because God didn't like jewelry, wouldn't He ask me to surrender the bracelets, necklaces, and rings too? I digress, though, maybe they really only had earrings...

My third concern is that this takes place right after 2 of Jacob's sons slaughter a whole town of men and take people from the town as hostage. They have taken possessions (possibly jewelry) from the people of Shechem (Genesis 34:24-29). I suspect part of the purification was to atone for the blood they had spilt. As is a theme in many of the verses that seem to support not wearing jewelry, the people being stripped of their jewelry are doing something God doesn't approve of that has seemingly nothing to do with their jewelry.

Hosea 2:13 and Jeremiah 2:32

In both of these verses, God complains that the people have put on their jewelry but forgotten Him. The issue is not that they are wearing jewelry. It takes time to put on make up and jewelry, to pick out a stylish outfit, and to adorn yourself such that society deems you "beautiful." However, in the grand scheme of things its of no importance. I don't need earrings in my ears to be considered fully dressed in the world. Thus, if I wake up and spend my whole morning preparing my outward dress but never stop to pray, speak to God, thank Him for waking me up, read His Word, etc., I've proiritized something trivial over someone very important. God is upset that His people a committed to little trinkets like jewelry over their covenant with Him.

Isaiah 3:16-26

In Isaiah 3, God is punishing "the daughters of Jerusalem," which is basically a way of saying His people. As part of the punishment, He will take away all their jewelry. As I spoke to the pastor about the verses used to support the argument of not wearing jewelry, this verse didn't come up but it's in the vein of what people usually bring up. Like the verses above, the people are in a state in which they need to be humbled and repent. They are boastful and proud; they have turned against God. God is taking back the things they love (not just jewelry) because they are unworthy. God is also going to shave their head, does that make hair bad? Clearly the point of this passage is that these are the things that make them feel great about themselves, they are all outward, physical things that establish wealth and beauty. Again this passage is about punishment for sin, not sins themselves.

More Verses I Found

The High Priest's Garments

in Exodus 28, when God tells them to make the breastplate for the high priest, not only is gold used, but many other precious stones...
17And thou shalt set in it settings of stones, even four rows of stones: the first row shall be a sardius, a topaz, and a carbuncle: this shall be the first row. 18And the second row shall be an emerald, a sapphire, and a diamond. 19And the third row a ligure, an agate, and an amethyst. 20And the fourth row a beryl, and an onyx, and a jasper: they shall be set in gold in their inclosings. 21And the stones shall be with the names of the children of Israel, twelve, according to their names, like the engravings of a signet; every one with his name shall they be according to the twelve tribes. 22And thou shalt make upon the breastplate chains at the ends of wreathen work of pure gold. 23And thou shalt make upon the breastplate two rings of gold, and shalt put the two rings on the two ends of the breastplate. Exodus 28:17-23 KJV
So many questions come to mind about this passage when trying to reconcile it with 1 Timothy and 2 Peter. Is it that men are allowed to wear jewels/jewelry but women are not? Is is that only the high priest can wear jewels? Or is it that Paul was referencing a specific issue at Ephesus?

Exodus 33:3-5

When the Israelites fail to stand for God, and He becomes angry at them, they take off their jewelry as a sign of mourning. God also strips them of the jewelry. Why is it that before they committed evil, God did not strip them of the jewelry if the jewelry was the problem? If you look at some of the verses in the Bible and research history, one form of jewelry that appears often is a signet ring. This ring was used as a seal or stamp. This was how signatures were verified, because only a person possessing the ring could make the seal. Such rings were given to heirs who were to inherit the authority of that signature. Similarly, the jewelry Israel had (and the jewelry we have) is something God gave us because we are His. When the Israelites turned against Him, they gave up the right to wear His signet.

Luke 15:22

In the parable of the prodigal son, the father welcomes his son back with a robe and a ring. Yes, Jesus could have been speaking in terms his listeners would understand, just as I might refer to the weeks in December that contain Hannukah, Christmas, and Kwanzaa, as "the holidays" without meaning to imply an endorsement of those holidays. Except, Jesus spent much of His time correcting man made traditions and getting people to truly follow God. No where else does He clarify this message to show us that He doesn't want us to wear rings. In fact, the father who is giving the ring is symbolic of God giving us a proper welcome when we return to Him.

James 2:1-4

In this passage once again we see a person wearing jewelry and the condemnation is not about his apparel but about favoritism. The message is, just because someone does not have nice clothes or jewelry does not give you the right to treat them differently. That's very different from saying the man who was not poor should not be dressed the way he is...

Ezekiel 16:11-13

Once again, straight from the mouth of God (per Ezekiel 16:1), in a parable about God's people, God says He adorns us with bracelets and jewels. Why is this the metaphor if God doesn't like or want us to wear jewelry?

Proverbs 25:12

Proverbs 25:12 compares a gold ring to receiving correction. Essentially the verse is saying that being able to give wisdom and correct people when they're wrong, in conjunction with the person who is wrong being able to receive that criticism, is valuable. You could argue that it is beautiful, necessary, even. So why is it compared to a gold ring if they are things we shouldn't have? That would be like saying "A wise correction to a receptive ear is like the satisfying crunch of bacon in the morning"...oh that's right, bacon isn't supposed to be satisfying even if we live in a society that loves bacon. That's why God nor His messengers ever create metaphors in which something they are proclaiming to be good or holy is placed on the same level as something He declared unclean or unholy.

More Verses to Read

  • Esther 8:2
  • Isaiah 6:10

If You Don't Stand Against It, You're For It

If you ever dip your feet into the conversation about racism, you'll quickly run into the concept of "if you don't stand against it, you're for it." By not taking a stance against racism, you tolerate it, which means it doesn't bother you. This allows it to flourish and grow. Similarly, weeds keep popping up in my flower bed. If I do not pluck them out, they will grow. I have to do something, say something in these situations if I'm truly against what is happening.

In all other cases, we see God take a stance. It is very clear where God stands on adultery, murder, stealing, idolatry, witchcraft, coveting, homosexuality, etc. The pastor brought up the issue of polygamy, but when you include the fact that God instructed the nation to have a king with not too many wives (Deuteronomy 17:17) and Jesus said that a man marrying a woman without a proper divorce commits adultery (Matthew 19:9). If a divorce is not proper, they are still married, therefore by taking another wife he is both engaged in polygamy and adultery. It sounds like a stance, straight from the mouth of God.

If God thought it an issue whether or not we wore jewelry, wouldn't He speak on it?

Back to Peter and Paul

Remember how I stopped to give you some context for the letters written in 1 Timothy and 1 Peter, but they didn't seem to have anything to do with anything. Let's go back to context, and pull in the concept of not braiding hair. In that time, it was common for wealthy women to braid their hair into elaborate styles. This was a status symbol. In addition to the elaborate styles, women would have gold, pearls (imagine that!), and other jewels braided into their hair. Not only was this a time consuming effort just to exert status, but the way the hair was braided is said to have marked the women as priestesses of pagan deities or even prostitutes. Perhaps Paul and Peter were actually referring to hair jewelry and this tendency to braid such things into the hair?[4][5][6]

My Answer to the Question

I already talked about my struggle with earrings in "Plain Jane." I don't think you'll ever see me with fanciful or ornate earrings, but that's a me problem. I definitely think that discernment should be used, and I agree that jewelry can have negative affects on us. I fully agree with Paul that I want people to think I'm beautiful because of the character of God being reflected in my actions and thoughts. I do not want people to know me because everyone is talking about how great my jewelry game is; that's not what I want to be known for. However, despite praying over this matter and researching it for many years (I wrote a post about it in June of 2016), the Holy Spirit has never convicted me that jewelry is a sin. That means one of two things: 1) I don't have communication with the Holy Spirit/I can't hear His voice or 2) He's not convicting me because it's not a concern He has. Considering the fact that during this time I have been convicted to reassess what I listen to, what I watch on TV, how I communicate with people, what I let my mind dwell on, on often I read the Bible, etc. during that time, I'd say it's probably the latter of the two possibilities—but I'll be sure to let you guys know if He ever does convict me that jewelry is flat out wrong.

References

  1. "Diana". Encylopædia Britannica. January 17, 2019
  2. "Artemis". Encylopædia Britannica. January 11, 2019
  3. "Ephesus". Encylopædia Britannica. March 30, 2017
  4. Aída Besançon Spencer. "1 Timothy: A New Covenant Commentary, pg. 57. 2013
  5. "Why does the Bible speak against braided hair?". GotQuestions.org; visited January 2019
  6. Kyle Butt, M.Div. "Wearing Gold and Braided Hair?". Apologetics Press; visited January 2019

Music Troubles

The argument of secular vs. Gospel and whether Christians should abstain from listening to Secular music is well know, but what about questionable Gospel?

Introduction

Music is a hard hitting subject amongst most devout Christians. I've had friends write posts on music and the importance of Christians listening to wholesome music. I even wrote a post on music censorship on my personal blog. Music plays a huge role in our lives and it has been documented (as I'm sured you've experienced) that music has a direct effect on a person's mood. I used to label certain music as "dark"—now I tend to use the word "hollow" instead—though I can't exactly describe what about the music sparks that decision. There's something about these songs that feel empty, like all life has been drained from them and they're just devoid.
Photocredit: FreeImages.com/Andrew Hiller
It's the type of music I imagine playing in the background as someone who has completely lost themselves shoots up cocaine, or something. There are other songs that are "warm"; they bring a smile to my face no matter what is happening and I feel happiness radiating from the song. In this post I wanted to talk about what the Bible tells us about music, what certain denominations teach about music, and point out some flaws even in Gospel music.
Top

The Bible on Music

While the Bible mentions music, singing, and instruments often, it doesn't specify anything about genres of music. We see cases where music is associated with idolatry (e.g. Daniel 3:5-7), but usually it is used to describe worshiping God. Music is a welcome part of His worship and the Bible makes no distinctions between genres of music. The simple conclusion is that music honoring God is good music and music dishonoring God is bad music.

Bible Verses

The Bible says a lot about music, here are just a few of the many verses that mention music, singing or instruments.
  • Genesis 4:21
  • Exodus 15:1
  • 1 Samuel 18:6
  • 1 Chronicles 15:16
  • 1 Chronicles 16:42
  • 2 Chronicles 5:13
  • 2 Chronicles 7:6
  • 2 Chronicles 23:13
  • 2 Chronicles 34:12
  • Nehemiah 12:36
  • Psalm 71:23
  • Psalm 95:1
  • Ecclesiastes 2:8
  • Ecclesiastes 12:4
  • Lamentations 3:63
  • Lamentations 5:14
  • Daniel 3:5
  • Daniel 3:7
  • Daniel 3:10
  • Daniel 3:15
  • Daniel 6:18
  • Amos 6:5
  • Luke 15:25
  • Ephesians 5:19
  • Hebrews 2:12
  • Revelation 18:22

Top

Denominational Teachings

Some churches forbid followers to listen to secular music. The church of my youth (Missionary Baptist) forbade instruments other than the piano and organ; when they replaced our piano with a keyboard, we were forbidden to use settings other than the piano setting in our songs. A great article on thinking about what type of music you listen to was authored by Bogdan Kipko. Though I have yet to find a specific statement from a denomination that says secular music is forbidden, many traditional churches teach this. For instance, I have attended "new" Baptist churches (a Baptist church with a relatively young congregation) that play Gospel Hip Hop in their services, whereas my church wouldn't even let us add a drumbeat to "The Little Drummer Boy" when I was growing up. It is definitely a point of contention amongst believers, and each church will tell you something different.
Top

Personal Thoughts on Music

As theomusicologist points out in his article "Afrobeats v. "Secular Music"," how we define secular music changes the perception of this topic tremendously. Most agree that anything you hear from the Billboard top 40 is probably secular—this generally includes Pop, Rock, Hip-Hop, R&B, and occasionally Country. But what about music that is generally instrumental, such as classical (e.g. Beethoven) or jazz (e.g. Louis Armstrong). In addition to including genres that are typically instrumental, one has to also wonder about the range of expression within a genre. Take Lauryn Hill's "Doo Wop (That Thing)" or Lyfe Jennings' "S.E.X.," both of which warn about the responsibilities and consequences of sex and promiscuous lifestyles (though Doo Wop definitely has language that some might find offensive, it is man that made these words vulgar). On the other end of the spectrum you have songs like Usher's "Lil' Freak" or Beyoncé's "Partition". This spectrum exists with many secular music genres, especially when you take into account that Contemporary Gospel is often not actually a separate genre, but merely a subset of a genre with Christian lyrics. For example, the music of Yolanda Adams or Mary Mary, is a blend of R&B, Hip Hop, and Gospel—just like Lauryn Hill, Lyfe Jennings, Usher, and Beyoncé. The only difference is what's being said. Similarly, I have instrumental versions of hymns, some of which are in the style of jazz, others more classical. Personally, I try to take music as it comes; I have music from almost every genre in my iTunes collection, though there are definitely songs in the collection that I don't listen to anymore. There are genres, like bluegrass, that simply don't appeal to me regardless of what the artist is saying, and other genres like Hip-Hop that if I'm not careful I will definitely sing along to ungodly music. There are a wide range of hurdles to be jumped when taking songs as they come. Many will label a whole genre as garbage (such is the case with Hip-Hop), but there is almost always something good inside each genre—the question is how much junk are you going to have to subject yourself to before you find it. There are artists who are consistently wholesome, artists who teeter on the line, and artists who are always vulgar. Then on top of the lyrical content of the music, there's the character of the person singing the songs. I don't become a diehard fan of artists and read every interview, tweet, etc. the artist has, but young children (and some adults) are highly influenced by what their favorite artists do. There are countless videos of people imitating artists, countless comments and tweets where people "attack" people for "attacking" an artist, and on Halloween, many will dress up as their favorite artist. This means that even if they're producing wholesome music, there is risk for prople who are prone to idolatry and celebrity influence (think of all the kids who listened to Hannah Montana when Miley Cyrus decided she couldn't be tamed).
Top

Hit and Miss Artists

As I said, in terms of sound (and I guess also in terms of style) some of the artists whom I love their voices and their sound, produce songs I both love and hate. For example: Kelly Rowland's "Stole" vs. "Kisses Down Low." The former shines light on how depression and gang violence is claiming the lives of children—I can't listen to the song without crying and wanting to be more sympathetic to those around me. I think God would approve of that. Yet, "Kiss Down Low" is simply glorification of pleasure; it's not associated with love, marriage, commitment. When you listen to songs like this, it doesn't make you think of anything that glorifies God or helps mankind; you think of self and pleasure, definitely not something God would want us shouting out and reveling in.
Top

Catch You Sleeping Artists

Then there are artists that while I love their entire albums and may not realize until months or years later, they have lyrics here and there that should give me pause. One such artist is India.Arie who has a beautiful voice and a beautiful sound (I've never heard a song by her that I didn't like), but refers to "a man with a husband or a woman with a wife" in her song "One." The song is about tolerance and love amongst people who believe different things; she says "we can debate until the end of time who's wrong or right" or simply see ourselves as one. I would agree that God wants us to love our neighbor regardless of their race, creed, religion, gender, or sexuality; though, I'm not sure God wants us singing about homosexuality, paganism, idolatry, etc. as though it is ok (she likens tolerance to a seed and acceptance as the tree...I'm pretty sure God doesn't want us to become acceptant of sin).
Top

Final Thoughts On Secular Music

It's a rough battle, particularly for those of us who grew up in a generation that has been taught tolerance, political correctness, and acceptance are the best traits to have. We've been taught that it is evil to be intolerant, which people are slowly turning into it being evil to be unaccepting as well. That makes songs like India.Arie's even more appealing—who doesn't wish we could all hold hands and have world peace?—but it can also lead us to turn away from God to be not just loving but acceptant of sinful behavior. As an adult, and someone who's been a believer for almost 3 decades, I can take the song for what it is and talk to God about how I feel (though I don't listen to the song on repeat everyday), but had I found this song at 10 years old, I'm not sure the impact it would have had on me. That's the difficulty of choosing what songs are appropriate to listen to versus not. Other secular artists like Bruno Mars, I expect for something questionable to come up and even though, aesthetically, I love almost all of his songs, I do have a bit of a wall up when I hear one of his songs for the first time (unlike with artists such as India.Arie). It doesn't take long for me to chose between "Yep, this is going on repeat" and "I don't think God would approve of this song" when it comes to artists like Bruno Mars. Then there are artists I don't bother to listen to the song at all because I already know something crazy is going to be in the song (or I just don't like their sound *shrug*).

Sometimes it does seem like it would be easier to just forego all secular music and stick to gospel (though there are a many of clean, powerful, and beautiful secular songs of which I think God would approve). Yet, Gospel music has its own downsides.
Top

Gospel Music

As I said, the alternative to listening to secular music, is Gospel. Growing up, my church (a Missionary Baptist Church) didn't allow Contemporary Gospel in the church. Our playlist mostly included traditional hymns and spirituals. The older church members (which consisted of most of the church) were not too keen on Contemporary Gospel and I couldn't really understand why. In my middle school and high school years I was introduced to artists like Mary Mary, Yolanda Adams, and Kirk Franklin, but it wasn't until college where I met Christians who listened to Contemporary Gospel frequently (or solely) that I started to listen to other artists and form a large number of songs under my Gospel playlist. As I began to listen to artists like James Moss, Fred Hammond, and Darwin Hobbs, I truly questioned why my home church wanted to stick to Negro Spirituals when we could listen to something more upbeat.

The first time I entered a mega church, I started to get an idea of what they didn't like. I honestly couldn't tell if I was in a church or a club. There were strobe lights, people dancing in the aisle, subwoofers that made my heart tremble to the beat of the bass, and people throwing money at the preacher like it was a strip club. Granted no one was twerking, but the music didn't sound any different than the songs they played at the fraternity parties I'd attended and I felt like I was in a zoo. I'm sure the person singing or rapping was saying something about God or Jesus, but just like I often have no idea what Pop artists are saying, I had no idea what they were saying. It was a little strange, and it made me think for the first time about whether the "type" of Gospel mattered.

That experience didn't stop me from listening to Contemporary Gospel, though I do prefer old songs with a contemporary sound over the new songs, and I don't attend mega churches. I tend to listen Contemporary Gospel that feels like it has the Spirit moving in it—something I guess takes prayer to discern. Yet, even then I'll sit to listen to songs and catch lyrics that are just as questionable, if not more questionable than secular music. I say that they're more questionable because we know that songs that are not about God are likely to have questionable lyrics, but we don't expect that of Gospel songs. This leaves us vulnerable as we are not listening to the songs with the intent to turn it off as soon as something bad is said or mentally bleeping out phrases we don't like so as not to internalize them (whether these methods work or not I'll leave for others to debate). Also, when you mess up lyrics about God you're teetering on the edge of blasphemy and using the Lord's name in vain. That's dangerous! Let me give some examples:
Top

Strange Things in Gospel Music

"I Believe" — Mali Music

I heard this song on iTunes radio and bought it shortly after because I felt a bit moved by it. In the song a man is discussing the importance of faith and declaring that he believes. He describes all the bad things going on in the world, points out hypocrisy, and lack of communion with the Word in the church. All in all, I thought he was hitting the nail on the head in terms of how the world is today. Yet, somewhere in the second verse, things get a little confusing.

But no matter what's going on...
Ima be standing... Ima be holding on
Your truth, their truth, my truth
Your god, my God, our view
All I know is one thing nowadays
Is we all need hope we all need faith

"I Believe" -Mali Music

When I stopped to listen to this part again, I didn't like it. Is he saying that it's ok to believe in different gods as opposed to the God of Abraham? To me it sounds like he's saying it doesn't matter what view or god you believe in as long as you have faith. That's definitely a tolerant way of looking at the world and a bit rosy, but it's not what the Bible teaches us. If you believe in Jesus and the Bible, the only faith that matters is faith in God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. Tolerance is something ingrained in us these days, to be accepting of our differences; while I agree that you shouldn't be out hating people simply because they disagree with you or practice different beliefs, that doesn't mean that you have faith in their practices or take part in them. I'm not sure exactly what Mali Music was trying to say in this passage, but I think it needs work. I mean, after hearing this verse it's not clear that he worships the God of the Bible; he mentions that people of God don't read their Bibles, but he isn't associated with this statement, then he goes on to talk about different gods; which god is he saying he believes in? So if I'm singing this song along with him, what exactly is it that I'm claiming I believe?

"We Fall Down" — Donnie McClurkin

We fall down
But we get up
We fall down
But we get up
We fall down
But we get up
For a saint is just a sinner who fell down,
But we couldn't stay there,
And got up

"We Fall Down" -Donnie McClurkin

"We Fall Down" by Donnie McClurkin played over and over at every Christian event I attended in college. The song's refrain repeats over and over, which is interesting in and of itself since Matthew 6:7 tells us not to use vain repetitions in our prayers. Was this to extend to songs of praise as well? Another interesting point is that when listening to the live version (that's the version I own), its actually very difficult to distinguish whether they are saying that a "saint" or "savior" is a sinner who fell down but got up. According to AZLyrics.com the word is saint, and I'd like to give Mr. McClurkin the benefit of the doubt because saying "a savior" not only implies more than one savior but also implies that our Savior wasn't perfect, which nullifies Him as our Savior. I certainly hope that people, particularly those who are new in the faith and would be more aware of the word savior than saint (saint tends to be a more popular word amongst some denominations than others), aren't misunderstanding this song. Top

"Lamb of God" — Nicole C. Mullen

Once upon a long night after a hard ride
Somewhere in Bethlehem
A baby graced the silence
Sweetly he's crying,
"I AM EMMANUEL"
Then angels gave him music
Shepherds gave reverence,
And a message to the land
A widow held and cherished
The God who became a man

"Lamb of God" -Nicole C. Mullen

"Lamb of God" by Nicole C. Mullen may be a less popular song than "We Fall Down," but I remember the first time I heard it, I was almost to tears. The chorus of the song is very moving, as the singer is expressing that she has nothing of value to give to Jesus so she gives herself. The lyrics are "But oh, Lamb of God, oh, Prince of peace, What tribute shall I bring to worship Thee, I have no gold to lay at Your feet, So Lamb of God I offer me." That's pretty powerful, right? Except in the first verse of the song (listed below) she mentions a widow holding and cherishing the baby. What widow? We are told wise men come to visit Jesus, but never a widow—is she talking about Mary? Mary wasn't a widow, she was a virgin. It is possible a widow visited Jesus, but the Bible doesn't tell us that. What producer, manager, Christian, allowed this woman to sing the word widow there? If you listen to the song, virgin doesn't have quite the same ease in the melody, but she could have said woman! Many people believe that by the time Jesus began His ministry Joseph had died, making Mary a widow, since he is not mentioned. However, at this point, Mary wasn't holding Jesus as He was a grown man. This completely ruins the song, it's not factual, and I probably sang this line once or twice before I realized what she was saying (just as churches warn about secular music). How many people are still singing "widow" thinking Mary was a widow at Jesus' birth? This could be a method of perpetuating the eternal virgin myth of the Catholic Church (post on this topic to come).

"I Call You Faithful" — Donnie McClurkin

Another song by Donnie McClurkin, though perhaps not as popular as "We Fall Down." This song is also very repetitive insisting upon the names they call God (Holy, Righteous, Awesome, Faithful, Healer, Savior, and All That). It seems fairly straightforward, and a simple way to praise once you get over the repetitiveness. Except at the beginning he says something that sounds like "nah s***" and I've yet to see a lyric translation that includes this or defines what he is actually saying. Near the end of the song he breaks into "tongues," which Paul tells us is best left to situations where someone can translate what is being said—which is probably not on a recording.[1][2] Since not a single lyrics site explains what Mr. McClurkin is saying, it leads me to question if he's actually speaking in tongues... If he is, someone should be able to interpret what he's saying, and I would think they would add that to the lyrics. How many people listen to this song a repeat words/phrases are foreign in meaning? Daniel 8:23 tells us the antichrist speaks/understands dark sentences; just because you're speaking a language you don't understand doesn't make it tongues!

Where is Jesus?

As I alluded to in the questions about who Mali Music is worshiping (who switched into secular music according to the interviews posted here), there are artists who never (or rarely) actually mention Jesus by name. Just as Joel Osteen danced around whether non-believers can get to heaven,[3] artists are leaving ambiguous messages about what they actually believe. Sometimes it's to avoid criticism from the secular world, which Jesus already warns us that we will be persecuted for His name and that we shouldn't back down.[4][5] One blogger points fingers at Michael W. Smith, and BeBe & CeCe Winans for avoiding Jesus in their songs.[8] I don't listen to the Winans, but I looked up the lyrics to the song in question, "Lost Without You." As the blogger stated, God, Jesus, nor Lord are used anywhere in the song. Similarly, The Ultimate Collection: BeBe &: CeCe Winans on iTunes has 26 songs, none of which have the name God, Jesus, or Lord in the title, though a couple—literally a couple, as in 2—ambiguously refer to "He" (which may be capitalized simply because its in the title of the song) and one is called "Heaven." I looked at the lyrics for 10 of their songs: 1 has Lord in it, 1 has God in it, and none mention Jesus. I don't know much about Michael W. Smith either; though I will say his 2001 album, Worship looks more promising, with both Jesus and God appearing at least once each in the title of a song. Another blogger criticizes Gospel Rapper Lecrae for partnering with secular artists such as Kendrick Lamar and David Banner. Some of the commenters believer Lecrae is trying to reach the unsaved using agruments about Jesus healing a prostitute and converting tax collectors, but they neglect that Jesus didn't go to the strip club to find the prostitute.[9] I think it is important for Christians to reach the unsaved, but that doesn't mean you become the world, Jesus already told us you can't serve two masters.[10] Katy Perry used to be a gospel artist (then known as Katy Hudson), but has since denounced her faith in God altogether and makes conflicting statements regarding her faith.[6] George Perdikis, co-founder of Christian group Newsboys, has also denounced his faith and is now claiming to be an atheist.[7] From the looks of things, it would seem that no music is "safe" and that as Christians we must keep our eyes and ears open at all times.
Top

References

  1. 1 Corinthians 12:10
  2. 1 Corinthians 14
  3. YouTube: Joel Osteen on Larry King Live. Uploaded April 2008
  4. Luke 17:33
  5. Matthew 5:10
  6. Chumley, Cheryl K. "Katy Perry, who renounced faith: God was with me for Super Bowl performance". The Washington Post. February 2015
  7. Brown, Michael. "Going Atheist: Newsboys George Perdikis and the Apostasy of Christian Believers. The Christian Post. January 2015
  8. Capital J. "The Devil's Power Over Music!". Expose The Devil October 2012
  9. Addison, Meeke. "Is it time for the Church to reevaluate Lecrae?". One News Now. January 2014
  10. Matthew 6:24
Top

DON'T MISS

Book Review,Food,Testimony
© 2022 all rights reserved
made with by templateszoo